![tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング](https://douga-tec.com/wp-content/uploads/421_tmpegencvideomasteringworks6_movieeditsoftware_004_009.jpg)
- TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング SOFTWARE
- TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング TRIAL
- TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング WINDOWS
Plus, the CCE encoding run was definitely faster. On high motion scenes about 1/3 of the TMPGenc frames show a lot of blockyness, the CCE encoded clip doesn't exhibit any of this.
TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング TRIAL
With both encoders I used 2 pass VBR with a max of 2500 and an average of ~1850.ĭoing a frame by frame comparison between the CCE Basic Trial encoded output and the TMPGenc Plus Trial encoded output shows major differences. I'm not going to noodle with MPEG1 anymore.Īnd on mpeg2,as i said cce loses on lower bitrates(svcd's) from tmpgenc. You certainly aren't the only one who thinks so. When you stack it to tmpgenc's mpeg1 you'll know what i mean.
TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング SOFTWARE
I'm sure the quality can't match that obtained with a software encoder doing multipass VBR though.Ĭce is making prety crappy mpeg1,in my opinion. I think you can get an Hauppage WinTV PVR250 for ~$100, which can produce MPEG2 video in realtime. I guess another option for MPEG2 is to get a hardware encoder. If you have your settings dialed in, you might also look at doing some of your processing during the capture stage when the CPU has idle time - things like noise-filtering and resizing. Don't noisefilter if you have a clean source. Avoid going from one lossy format to another.
![tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング](https://zigsow.jp/img.php?a=a&filename=mi_18080_1403166844_506447753.png)
For example, don't overdo your resolution if you are working with VHS. In a similar vein, getting the settings right and optimizing your workflow is also important. Paying the ~$60 for the basic version of CCE might be the most cost-effective option for improving encoding times. From what I have seen posted CCE is ~2x faster than TMPEG for MPEG2 encoding at similar levels of quality and ~3x for MPEG1 (using a PIII) which feels about right to me given my experience trying to get a good combo of settings for an X(S)VCD. I will emphasize the point made relatively late in this thread, which is that the software used will also make a significant impact.
![tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング](https://thehikaku.net/pc/hp/image/16omen870/passmark-cpu.jpg)
I'll note that the original poster seems to be making DVDs from a videotape source, so it would seem that there is some potential that HDD performace might have a noticable impact if he is going the optimal route of capturing in a lossless format like HuffYUV before encoding.
![tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング tmpgenc video mastering works 6 リッピング](http://nln.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/20190124_TVMW6_q.png)
TMPGENC VIDEO MASTERING WORKS 6 リッピング WINDOWS
Granted, I am using dialy snapshots of mencoder, so I don't know if interlace outputs work with the last windows compile version of mencoder. I didn't have an issue playing it back, so it should work. I was trying mpeg2 just to see mencoder's ability. I am pretty sure but can't be 100% since I encode mainly in mpeg1. (and i'm interested in laced mpeg2 only because my machine is too slow for laced playback of 720x576 mpeg4.)Īlso,if you're doing dvd's cce is much faster than tmpgenc tmpgenc will kill ANY cpu.įor lower bitrates ,though,tpgenc will look better (for example svds.) Only mpeg2 i'm interested in is interlaced and libav won't help me there. Tuco can you encode interlaced video with mencoder? Hdd speed doesn't matter at all for encoding.(as versa said)ĭon't think faster hdd will make a significant difference instead go buy faster cpu.cpu's encode video(every single frame of it) and hdd will never have problems to write that lo-bitrate encoded stream.